There is a
textual variant with reference to Apollo's knowledge of Jesus. This could be the difference, if he knew more
than the 12 disciples of John, and he only needed informed about the death and resurrection
having been fulfilled.
Those who
are seriously committed and zealous in the word will respond positively in
short order when given clarification in the word of God.
The
reception of the Spirit could be no more than receiving spiritual gifts that
for Jews had to be clearly in connection with faith in Christ, and therefore,
unlike Cornelius, this manifestation came after baptism.
Jews and
Samaritans had to "received" the Spirit after baptism in Christ's
name and after apostolic recognition to make it certain it was in connection
with faith in Christ and not merely because of their association with the Jewish or Samaritan religion.
This view requires a distinction between
regeneration and receiving the Spirit.
There has to
be something different about these situations when compared to Gentile
salvation as in the case of Cornelius who received the Spirit the moment he
believed and before Baptism in Acts 10.43-48--which is held to be the normal
Christian experience.
It seems in
all these accounts that receiving the Spirit is associated with Christ being
believed in, or through baptism in connection with Christ, or through contact
with an Apostle of Christ.
The
disciples of John were surely informed of the coming of Christ and the baptism
of the Holy Spirit, and they had believed in Him according to the message of
John. It's possible they did not know
specifically about Jesus being the Christ. They did not know the Spirit was
given in the capacity prophesied. The
baptism of repentance was a call to get right with God in anticipation.
They may have left before Jesus appeared on
the scene. It would seem odd that they
didn't know all that occurred since that time with Jesus, but where they had been may have kept them
isolated.
Apollos was
eloquent and mighty in the Scriptures, taking the message of John to the
synagogues. He surely was an OT believer
in the coming Savior. The Greek text of the KJV says he spoke of the Lord, but
the Greek of the Alexandrian says he spoke of Jesus--was this actual knowledge
or prophetic knowledge? His message was
accurate, but Aquila and Priscilla had a fuller revelation based on what had
transpired in the person of Jesus. They
had more accurate info to dispatch to Apollos. He may have learned from
Disciples of John in Alexandria.
There's no reference
to Apollos being baptized or receiving the Spirit here.
He obviously
received it most readily, which shows his handle on the word of God and the
faith he already possessed. He took the
further revelation and ran with it--to Corinth in Achaia.
That
repentance can precondition or facilitate faith in Christ is seen in the
response of both Apollos and the 12 disciples of John. Both responded positively to the further
revelation.
Apollos
ministry in Corinth was a grace message: he comforted through grace, though this particular grace could refer to Apollo's gift. But consider: "Now when the congregation had broken up, many of the Jews and devout proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God." Acts 13:43.
No comments:
Post a Comment