The total
number of people who hold or are eligible for Israeli
citizenship under the "Law of Return"— defined as anyone
with at least one Jewish grandparent, and who does not profess any other
religion — is estimated at around 23 million, of which 6.6 million were living
in Israel as of 2015. Figures for these expanded categories are less precise
than for the core Jewish population.
While dozens
of countries host at least a small Jewish population, the community is
concentrated in a handful: Israel and the United
States account for 83% of the Jewish population, while a total of 98
countries host the other 17%.
The term
"Ashkenazi" refers to Jewish settlers who established communities
along the Rhine River in Western Germany and in Northern France
dating back to the Middle Ages. Once
there, they adapted traditions from Babylon, The Land of Israel, and the
Western Mediterranean to their new environment.
The Holocaust had
a devastating impact on the Ashkenazim, affecting almost every Jewish family. It
is estimated that in the 11th century Ashkenazi Jews composed only three
percent of the world's total Jewish population, while an estimate made in
1930 (near the population's peak) had them as 92 percent of the world's
Jews. Immediately prior to the Holocaust, the number of Jews in the world
stood at approximately 16.7 million. Statistical
figures vary for the contemporary demography of Ashkenazi Jews, ranging from 10
million to 11.2 million. Sergio Della Pergola in a rough calculation
of Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews, implies that Ashkenazi Jews make
up less than 74% of Jews worldwide. Other estimates place Ashkenazi Jews as
making up about 75% of Jews worldwide.
Those who
call themselves Jews today do so because of ancestry and probably a cultural or
religious connection or belief. They
must want to maintain that identity to some extent.
Romans 11.26
speaks of all Israel being saved. Though
the Apostle Paul says in Romans 9 that they are not all Israel who are of
Israel, the reference to Israel concerns their national identity.
This
salvation in Romans 11.26 is as a people, a nation. It does not mean every individual Jew will be
saved—spiritually, as in being right with God, and physically, as an
identifiable legitimate nation among nations in a geographically fixed place.
It seems a
little complicated in what Paul is saying in Romans 11. Paul speaks about the breaking off of some of
the natural branches (Jews/ Israelites), in the analogy of an olive tree and
its branches, being meant as the setting aside of the Jewish nation, but not
the elimination of them as individuals Jews from being saved—since believing
Jews in Christ become part of the Church.
Paul speaks of them being grafting in "again" in vs 23 which must
speak of something other than individuals, for individuals can be saved through
the present age of the Church. This must
look to them as a people, nation. The
word "again" is not suggesting that certain individuals were broken
off, and then grafted in again when they believed again. The unnatural branches, being non-Jews,
gentiles, that were grafted in could be "cut off" if they don’t
continue in belief, 11.22—even here the view must be to a people as in the
gentiles (the unnatural branches in the analogy). The issue here must be a place of privilege
and blessing, represented in the Olive tree.
The people, nation of Israel will be grafted in again to this place of
privilege and blessing.
Charles
Hodge on Romans 11:26: "Israel here
must mean the Jewish people, and 'all Israel' the whole nation. The Jews, as a people, are now rejected; as a
people they are to be restored. As their
rejection, although national, did not include the rejection of every
individual, so their restoration though national, need not include the
salvation of every Jew. All Israel does
not mean all the true people of God, as Augustine, Calvin, and others explain
it; nor all the elect Jews -- i.e., all that part of the nation which
constitute "the remnant according to the election of grace" --but the
whole nation, as a nation. (Romans Commentary
Who is
Israel? They are both ethnic and
spiritual. The ethnic determination is that
one grandparent being Jewish-- and a religious one--of Jewish belief. The "law of Return is a matter of
debate, since most peoples are not ethnically pure. There must be some genetic link. Israel has a genetic requirement."
The
Abrahamic Covenant was a promise of blessing through Abraham to all nations,
and a promise of blessing to his natural descendants in a land of promise. Gen
13.14-15 "And the Lord said to Abram, after Lot had separated from him:
“Lift your eyes now and look from the place where you are—northward, southward,
eastward, and westward; for all the land which you see I give to you and your
descendants forever."
Those
descendants were placed under covenant that required obedience to be blessed in
the land of promise, being the Mosaic.
But they failed. And so were
driven out.
But because
of the Abrahamic Covenant, God made a new covenant, so a natural seed who count
as spiritual seed may inherit the promises.
The Jews are
saved in same manner as Gentiles. Acts
15.11
The new
covenant guarantees the continuance of the nation. Jeremiah 31.31-37
Genesis
15.7-21: Abraham is given a promise of
the land.
Deut
4.26-32: Moses foretold Israel's failure
and judgment, but because of the covenant with the father's, Israel will be
restored.
Romans 11:
23-29 says they will be grafted in again
if they don’t continue in unbelief.
Only those
who count as spiritual seed inherit the promises: Romans 9-11.
It will be natural seed that count as spiritual seed. This is with reference to certain temporal
promises.
God will
both save and bless his people. Those
people are of differing identities in time, but that salvation and blessing is
through the one who came riding on a donkey, and is coming again, whose
authority is from "sea to sea." Zechariah 9.9-10
In Zech 5,
we see an angel pushing "wickedness" back down into the basket, and
putting a lid on it. Could this compare
to 2 These 2 concerning the restraining of the revealing of the son of
lawlessness? Daniel 10:12 reveals an
angelic conflict involving restraining.
A house
prepared for it--could this be the temple for the “Abomination Of Desolation?”
Yet the
restraining of 2 Thess 2 seems an issue of timing and circumstances. It involves the right time and circumstances
for that particular roll of the “lawless one” as described.
The plan of
God concerning Israel was not restoration following Pentecost. God could have done it with the few thousands
that did respond to the Gospel, but he didn't.
Romans 11 explains kind of why. "But through their fall, to provoke
them to jealousy, salvation has come to the Gentiles. Now if their fall is
riches for the world, and their failure riches for the Gentiles, how much more
their fullness!"
If a larger
number would have believed, how would prophecy had been fulfilled? Would the temple had been destroyed still, as
Jesus foretold? Wouldn’t it need to be
destroyed, since that was judgment on the nation: "they will not leave in
you one stone upon another, because you did not know the time of your
visitation.” Luke 19:44
How would
the abomination of desolation fit in and the great tribulation period?
I'm sure
there is a creative way to explain this.
But their rejection and God's plan is all figured in. Things had to take their course; there has to
be an offer of the kingdom so it can be rejected--even though the rejection was
to be inevitable.
Again, God
could have restored Israel with the remnant who believed, but that was not
God's plan, for Romans 11 reveals that plan.
The Church
practices baptism and communion. One
could argue the Jews were to practice these until Christ came, during that
period between Pentecost and second coming.
Mat 24.18
"All these are but the beginning of the birth pains." Birth pains are the sorrows and difficulty
that precede a birth. This was true for
Israel coming out of Egypt. It will be
true for Israel coming out of Great Tribulation. It is true for creation in Romans 8.22
"For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs
together until now."
No comments:
Post a Comment