Genesis 25:23
“And the Lord said to her: "Two nations [are] in your
womb, Two peoples shall be separated from your body; [One] people shall
be stronger than the other, And
the older shall serve the younger."
Romans 9:11-13:
“ (for [the] [children] not yet being born, nor having done
any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand,
not of works but of Him who calls), 12 it was said to her, "The
older shall serve the younger." 13 As it is written, "Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated."
Notice Paul quotes Genesis 25:23 that says “two nations” and “two
peoples” in Rebecca.
God chose Jacob and his descendants over Esau and his. The
older shall serve the younger.
Charles Cranfield
says in his commentary on Romans, 9:12-
“’The elder shall serve the younger’ is an exact quotation of the
last part of the Septuagint version of Gen 25:23. The interest of this
Genesis verse as a whole is clearly in Jacob and Esau not just as individuals
but also, and particularly, as the ancestors of two nations; for the part
quoted is preceded by ‘Two nations are in thy womb’ And two peoples shall be
separated from thy bowels: and one people shall be stronger than the
other people.’ It is important to stress that neither as they occur in
Genesis nor as they are used by Paul do these words refer to the eternal
destinies either of these two persons or of the individual members of the
nations that sprung from them; the reference is rather to the mutual
relations of the two nations in history.
…There is no doubt that the concern of Mal 1.2-5 is with the
nations of Israel and Edom, and Paul probably thought of the words from
Genesis, but expressing it more clearly and
pointedly, and therefore suitable as a further and decisive corroboration of
what had just been said, and, in particular, of the words of Genesis 25:23
(“the elder shall serve the younger”). …”love” and “hate” are
rather to be understood as denoting election and rejection respectively.
God has chosen Jacob and his descendants to stand in a positive relation to the
fulfillment of His gracious purpose: He left Esau and Edom outside
that relationship.”
Consider Deut 10:15:
15 "The Lord delighted only in your fathers, to love
them; and He chose their descendants after them,
you above all peoples, as [it] [is] this day.
Ex 19:5-6:
5 `Now therefore, if you will indeed
obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special
treasure to Me above all people ; for all the earth [is]
Mine.
6 `And you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy
nation.' These [are] the words which you shall speak to the children of Israel."
The words
by the Apostle Paul in Romans 9.13, taken from Malachi 1.2-3, reveal that God
had a priority of
commitment with Jacob
and Israel over that of with Esau and Edom.
We should
not understand "hate" in the sense that God determined to eternally
condemn Esau or his descendants. It's true in the Malachi context that God
shows contempt towards Esau and Edom--the
nation that comes from him, but this contempt and judgment are due to their
conduct, particularly for their treatment of Israel.
God had a
covenant with Israel through Abraham and Isaac that
resulted in a priority of commitment. God would fulfill His covenant through
Jacob and Israel--even though
their conduct was as bad or worse than Edom's.
God did
not enter into a special relationship/ covenant with Esau and his descendants.
God did not make a commitment with Esau/ Edom like he did with Jacob/ Israel.
This
statement about love and hate does not mean all Israelites will be saved or
that all Edomites will be lost. Though Israel's
conduct eventually resulted in Divine judgment, God will still restore them,
but Edom will get no special treatment--Divine
judgment will continue on Edom because of their conduct.
God's
priority of commitment was to Israel.
Not every
Israelite will have everlasting life, just as not every Edomite will go to
Hell.
Israel was God's people for his purpose in
time, to show forth God's holiness and salvation to the world.
The idea of priority of commitment with reference to hate is
seen in connection with discipleship.
Luke
14.25-27: Now great multitudes went with Him. And He turned and said to them, "If anyone comes to Me and
does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers
and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple.
"And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me
cannot be My disciple.”
Isn’t
this a contradiction? To hate one's parents?
Paul
speaking with reference to one of the 10 commandments says: (Ephesians 6:1-3) Children,
obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. "Honor your father and
mother," which is the first commandment with promise: "that it may be
well with you and you may live long on the earth."
Christ informs
His disciples that they must “hate” family and self to be His disciple. This
hate cannot mean we must violate one of the commandments.
Christ was
maybe using such language as an attention getter. But surely, this must not be a
detesting or a lack of concern or responsibility for family members. It has to
do with priority of commitment.
Honoring
one's parents does not mean the parent should dictate one's priority of
commitment to God. Of course, one always
needs to use discernment on where to “draw the line” when it comes to obedience
to God and honoring and caring for parents
and family members.
"Hate” involves a commitment that can be life-threatening.
"Hate” involves a commitment that can be life-threatening.
Acts 15.
24-26: Since we have heard that some who went out from us have
troubled you with words, unsettling your souls, saying, "[You] [must] be
circumcised and keep the law"--to whom we gave no [such] commandment--it
seemed good to us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men to you
with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Romans
16.3-4: Greet Priscilla and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, who risked their own necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches
of the Gentiles.
No comments:
Post a Comment